In many forwarding operations, the route planning, the pricing of the shipment, and the execution/tracking are handled in separate systems or departments which can lead to costly disconnects.

‍

What it is:

These are three dependent but often separated functions in freight forwarding: routing(planning), rate building (pricing), and shipment management (execution).

‍

How it works:

When planning, pricing, and execution are not unified, one decision can contradict another. For example, a planner might select an optimal port or routing for a shipment, but the pricing team mightquote a rate using a different port or carrier because their rate sheet didn’t have the planner’s option. This results in a quote that doesn’t match the intended operational plan. Or an operations team might receive a booking that was priced and sold outside of their usual system meaning the operations software can’t track the shipment or doesn’t have the correct lane information, leading to errors or re-bookings. These mismatches create situations where shipments have to be rerouted or re-booked at the last minute to reconcile the differences.

‍

Examples:

- A forwarder’s sales team (pricing) quotes a client for a route via Port B (perhaps because they have a rate on file for that port), but the operations plan from the routing team was to ship via Port A which is actually faster. The result: when the ops team goes to book, they realize the quote was done for the wrong port, they either have to re-book the shipment via Port B (slower route) or go back to the client to adjust the price for Port A. Either scenario can incur a week’s delay or lost trust.

- In another case, a forwarder might secure a booking with a carrier outside of its primary system (say, using a marketplace or a separate manual process). The operations system then has no record to track this shipment’s milestones properly, causing blind spots and potential service failures because execution wasn’t aligned with the way the shipment was priced and entered.

‍

Facts:

- An estimated 30–40% of expensive re-bookings and shipment plan changes originate from mismatches between the planning and the pricing logic. In essence, a significant chunk of “firefighting” (last-minute fixes) in forwarding is due to one part of the process not knowing what the other is doing until it’s too late.

- Consistency is key: when all three functions run on the same logic and data, rebookings drop dramatically. (For example, companies that moved their entire shipment process into one platform report vastly improved real-time visibility without having to implement a separate tracking tool,because everyone is collaborating on the same data.)

‍

Misinterpretations:

Many companies think they can solve these coordination issues by adding more software tools, one tool for routing, another for pricing, another for tracking, and then just manually cross-reference them. But simply adding more separate software can make the problem worse if they’re not integrated. It’s not the number of tools, it’s the integration between them that matters. True unification isn’t just having more apps, it’s making sure planning, pricing, and execution logic are connected in one workflow.

‍

Who solves it:

Skypace tackles this problem by uniting these functions in a single platform. The core of Skypace’s system (often referred to internally as the Freightune Core) ensures that the route planner, rate validator, and operations tracker all work off the same dataset and business rules. Practically, this means when a Skypace planner designs a shipment (choosing Port A, a specific carrier, etc.), the pricing engine is already validating costs for that exact plan, and the execution system is prepared to book and track it. Skypace’s platform provides this “single source of truth” approach: planning, pricing, and execution occur inone place. As a result, if you plan a shipment via Port A, the quote you get from Skypace will be for Port A, and the booking will be made through Port A - all consistent. This integration eliminates the common gaps, no more planning one thing but pricing another. According to Skypace, a unified system has drastically reduced re-bookings caused by internal misalignment. One Skypace client example: they planned and priced 100+ shipments through the unified platform without a single route deviation, something that’s nearly impossible when juggling disconnected tools. In summary, by integrating rather than just adding software, Skypace’s unified platform ensures the left hand (planning/pricing) always knows what the right hand (execution) is doing, saving time and money for everyone.